I was pleased to get positive feedback, last Friday, on my final assignment submission of the module. The work was described as a “progressive journey”, as “contributing to contemporary cultural discourses around the challenges and implications of digital identity”, and also as having “interrogated the transformation of the medium itself as a result of digital technology” – all good to read, and satisfying after nearly two years work. He also feels that it has a lot of potential for further exploration – which is great, but also makes me reflect on whether, by pursuing two projects, I have been in danger of never quite drilling down into either. Should I have done more contextual work on identity, for example, in support of the ‘Portraits’ project? Too late now, anyway, and the feedback is good all round on both this module and CS, so I’m probably just fretting!
I submitted some A4 prints of the ‘Portraits’ and various examples from ‘Textbook’ – the first time I’ve sent prints throughout the module. These were my own prints, so I was pleased to get positive feedback on those, too. Interesting to look back two years, when I was about to submit the last of my L2 modules for assessment. I had been producing my own prints but began ‘fretting’ then, too; about whether I should be getting professional prints done. I did, in the end, but never felt quite as happy with them as I’d been with my own. I thought I was playing safe, in a way; that by sending in professionally produced and mounted (at my then tutors suggestion) prints, I must be on solid ground. I reflected in my last post here on the development of ‘confidence’ through BoW. With the confirmation of this recent feedback, I feel confident that I know what I’m doing with my own prints of my own work – so that’s the plan for assessment.
Which brings me to ‘what remains …’ – lots still to be done, actually, to get everything ready for assessment in the next two and half months:
- ‘Textbook will be submitted in book form, with some selected, supporting, large prints, representative of what might be used for an exhibition. I have sourced what I hope will be an appropriate paper (less heavy) for the final version (due for delivery today), but I may still have to alter the way I structure the ‘signatures’ to enable it to be bound properly. I didn’t get any detailed feedback on the sequencing and editing I had presented. I could take that as a positive, but I’m wondering whether to ask the ‘hangout’ group to also take a look at it for me in the next couple of weeks. Then there’s the little matter of producing it!! [Some inspiration from a gallery visit on Saturday, though – Bank Street, Sheffield has had a show of 200 artists’ books, selected from 450+ entries for their bi-annual book competition. Saturday was the last day, but just managed to get to see it. There was some truly wonderful work – all of which one was permitted to pick and browse, a very special experience.]
- The presentation of ‘Portraits’ is still a little uncertain, a view for which I got tutor support in the feedback. Prints at A3 or A3+ will be the main form of presentation, but I do need to direct the assessor towards the wider context in which the images are presented. One suggestion from my tutor was to get the assessor to do a Google Images search and see some of them online at first hand. Then I also have the ‘Stanley Quest’ website and ‘The Stan’ tabloid. It needs some reflection – how to get across the breadth of what I’ve done without overwhelming the assessor!
- My Introductory Notes and Evaluation both got a ‘thumbs up’, too. They’ll need a little bit of refinement, but more or less done.
So, still a fair bit to do, but I’m genuinely into the final straight!